Is this your first time here? SwingWiki is a Java Swing Developer community site with an big archive of Swing-related usenet groups and mailing lists, but also tips, tricks and articles and book reviews written by your colleagues from around the world. If you came here through a search engine and did not find what you were looking for, make sure to check the wiki table of contents.
Re: Does anyone else thinks that swing.text is the worst part of
| From:[jdnc-interest@masked-domain] |
| Sent on:Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:29:00 PDT |
| In reply to:Re: Does anyone else thinks that swing.text is the worst part of sent on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:05:47 PDT by [jdnc-interest@masked-domain] |
I am not convinced about the need to call super, simply because it is in the AbstractUndoableEdit.
I would image that it would be pretty easy for the UndoManager itself to make that operation itself by package private api. It makes no sense exept if the interface itself (UndoableEdit) says so in the javadoc - implementations will require a super call on undo and redo - and it doesn't at least on java 1.5.
Still don't agree with the lack of notification, but can understand it in the context offered. BTW when i was thinking about this yesterday i figured this is just a specific usecase of something larger: observable collections. Maybe - that - should be in the jdk.
[Message sent by forum member 'i30817' (i30817)]
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=285219
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [jdnc-unsubscribe@masked-domain]
For additional commands, e-mail: [jdnc-help@masked-domain]
Other messages in this topic
